Advanced generation/backcrossed (non-F1) hybrids can be challenging to identify when their traits are similar to those of parental taxa, F1 hybrids, or both. This is particularly evident in the North American hybrid zone involving Typha latifolia, T. angustifolia, F1 T. × glauca and non-F1 hybrids. Cattails are challenging to differentiate based on gross morphological characteristics. Microscopic characteristics in female inflorescences have not been previously studied to differentiate parental taxa from non-F1 hybrids. To investigate whether researchers can use microscopic floret and bracteole characteristics for taxonomic identification, I compared pistillate flower length, bracteole length and width, and bracteole colour among taxa. I found that floret and bracteole characteristics can be useful for identifying T. latifolia but cannot accurately differentiate T. angustifolia and F1 T. × glauca from non-F1 hybrids. Further, a flowering bias can lead to the underestimation of the frequency of T. latifolia when using floral characters to examine the relative abundance of cattail taxa.
Author Keywords: advanced-generation hybrids, backcrossed hybrids, invasive species, morphology, species identification, Typha spp.